Mazo › Go-to-market by market › Cybersecurity

Guide · Cybersecurity GTM

Go-to-market strategy for cybersecurity products

By Madalena Rugeroni, founder of Mazo · Updated 17 September 2026 · 9-minute read

Security buyers are professional sceptics who are pitched every day, and budget moves when something forces it — an incident, an audit, a customer requirement, a regulation. That produces a market where marketing claims are actively distrusted and where timing beats persuasion. The founders who win are usually practitioners themselves, sell into a named forcing event, and prove the product on the buyer's own environment rather than in a slide. In a category this crowded, being credible is more valuable than being differentiated, and being specific is how you become credible.

Why go-to-market for security products is different

Everything in security GTM follows from two facts: the buyer is technical and has been marketed to relentlessly, and the budget is usually released by an event rather than by a plan.

Your buyer distrusts vendors as a professional habit. Security practitioners spend their working lives assessing claims critically, and they extend that to yours. Any unsupported superlative costs you credibility you will not get back, and they will check.
Budget follows incidents, audits and customer demands. Security spend is rarely a planned improvement. It is released by a breach, a failed audit, a cyber insurance requirement, a regulation, or an enterprise customer's security questionnaire. Timing beats persuasion.
The category is crowded and the buyer knows it. Most security buyers already own overlapping tools and suffer from alert fatigue and tool sprawl. What is this replacing is a better opening question than what does it do.
Being wrong is expensive in both directions. A tool that misses things is dangerous; a tool that floods the team with false positives gets switched off within a month. Your proof has to address both, with their data.

Mazo's rule of thumb: Lead with what you replace or retire, not with what you add. A security team drowning in tools hears one more dashboard as a cost, and hears removes two of your existing tools as a reason to take the meeting.

Who actually buys security products, and who blocks it

Security deals have a practitioner who judges you and an executive who funds you, and the path between them runs through a business risk conversation the practitioner is often not the best person to have.

Role	What they care about	What they do to your deal
Security engineer or analyst (the evaluator)	False positive rate, coverage, noise, integration with the existing stack	Kills deals fast and quietly. Wins you enormous credibility if convinced, because peers listen to them.
CISO or head of security (the buyer)	Risk reduction they can report, audit and compliance posture, team capacity	Holds the budget and needs a story that survives a board or audit conversation.
Finance or the CEO (the approver)	Whether this is necessary, what happens without it, contractual and insurance exposure	Releases funds when a forcing event exists. Says later when it does not.

The trigger to watch for. The trigger is a forcing event with a date: an incident or near miss, an audit or certification deadline, an enterprise customer's security requirement, a cyber insurance condition, or a new regulation. Find companies inside one of those windows and your conversion rate changes more than any messaging rewrite would achieve.

The motion that fits your price

Security spans from developer-adopted tools to enterprise platform sales, and the motion has to match who evaluates you, not just the price.

Annual price per customer	Motion that pays for itself	What breaks if you pick wrong
Under €5K/yr	Self-serve, practitioner-adopted, often bottom-up like a developer tool.	A high-touch sales process. The economics fail and practitioners resent the friction.
€5K–€50K/yr	Founder-led sales with a hands-on proof of value in the customer's environment.	Selling on claims. This buyer will insist on testing you, so plan the test rather than resisting it.
€50K+/yr	Enterprise sales with a formal evaluation, compliance mapping and often a channel partner or MSSP route.	Skipping the compliance mapping. At this level buyers need your product tied to a framework they report against.

Mazo's rule of thumb: Design a proof of value that runs in two weeks on their data and produces a finding they did not already know. A single concrete discovery in their environment closes more security deals than a quarter of nurture.

Three channels that work for security products, and one that doesn't

Security practitioners discover tools through peers, through original research and through the communities where they compare notes. None of those channels reward promotion, and all of them reward being genuinely useful in public.

Original research and technical publication

The category's highest-trust channel

Novel research, a disclosed vulnerability, a real dataset or a detailed teardown earns attention from exactly the people you want, and establishes practitioner credibility that no amount of advertising buys.

First action this week: Publish one piece of genuine original analysis from data or work you already have, with method shown, and no product pitch in it.

Practitioner communities and peer networks

Slow, founder-led, decisive

Security professionals rely heavily on peer recommendation because the cost of a bad tool is high. Regional meetups, closed communities and specialist forums are where those recommendations are made.

First action this week: Join the two communities your best customers are in and contribute for a month without mentioning your product.

Free tools that do something genuinely useful

Generates qualified pipeline

A free scanner, checker or assessment that returns a real result gives a practitioner a reason to try you with no commitment and hands you a warm, self-identified list of organisations with the problem.

First action this week: Ship the smallest useful check from your product as a free tool that returns a real finding, with no email gate on the result.

The one to skip for now: Fear-based advertising

Security buyers have been marketed at with fear for decades and are inoculated against it. It reads as a signal that a vendor lacks substance, and practitioners will say so to the colleagues whose opinions you need.

Skip is not never. Threat messaging works when it is specific, sourced and about something they can verify — a named technique, your own research, their actual exposure.

Your first 10 security products customers

Your first ten security customers exist to prove the product finds real things without drowning the team, in environments you did not choose. Nothing else will convince the eleventh.

Target companies inside a forcing event. Firms pursuing a certification, responding to enterprise security questionnaires, or just past an incident. The event, not the profile, is your targeting criterion.
Run a scoped proof of value on their data. Two weeks, defined scope, agreed success criterion, and a report at the end whether it went well or badly. The report itself builds credibility.
Measure false positives openly. Publishing your own noise rate, and how you reduce it, disarms the objection that ends most security evaluations and marks you as a practitioner rather than a marketer.
Map to the frameworks they report against. Show which control or requirement you satisfy. It turns your product from a nice improvement into a line item that justifies itself in an audit.

The pass/fail test: Every proof of value should surface at least one finding the customer did not already know about. If it does not, you are selling reassurance, and reassurance does not renew.

Pricing security products: the value metric and the trap

The value metric that usually works here. Price on the surface you protect — endpoints, identities, repositories, workloads, domains or employees — because that is how security teams already size risk and budget, and it grows with the customer without surprising them.

The trap. Pricing on alerts, events or data volume. It penalises the customer for exactly the conditions under which they most need you, and creates the perverse situation where a bad security month produces a bigger invoice.

Mazo's rule of thumb: Make the price defensible against the cost of the event you prevent, and against the tools you replace. Security budgets are justified by comparison, so give your champion both comparisons in writing.

Test the number before you commit to it: the free willingness-to-pay test designs a 7-day, commitment-based price test with a pass line attached.

What to measure, by stage

In security the leading indicator is not pipeline volume, it is whether evaluations finish. Deals die in the proof of value more than anywhere else.

Stage	The one number	The line
Pre-revenue	Proofs of value that produce a novel finding	Every one, or the detection is not differentiated
First 10 customers	Proof of value to paid conversion	Above half, with the losses explained by fit not noise
€10K+ MRR	Renewal rate and tools replaced per customer	Renewals near total; something retired in most accounts

The lines above are Mazo's working thresholds for this market, not published industry benchmarks. Use them to force a decision, then replace them with your own numbers as soon as you have 10 customers.

The mistakes we see most in security products

Marketing claims a practitioner can disprove in ten minutes

Superlatives, invented categories and unverifiable accuracy numbers are treated as evidence of weakness by this audience, and they will test the claim and tell their peers what they found.

Instead: Publish the method behind every number, including the conditions where the product performs worst.

Ignoring alert fatigue in the pitch

Selling more detection to a team already overwhelmed by alerts sounds like more work. The buyer's real problem is often triage capacity, not coverage.

Instead: Lead with noise reduction and what you retire, and quantify both in the proof of value.

Selling to the CISO without convincing the analyst

An executive sale over the head of the team produces a tool nobody uses and a churn event at renewal, plus a practitioner who tells peers it was forced on them.

Instead: Win the evaluator first and give them the material to make the business case upwards.

The objection that kills security products deals

"We already have a tool that does some of this. Why add another?"

Tool sprawl is the defining condition of security teams and this objection is rational. Partial overlap is not a reason to buy; consolidation, a gap that matters, or a meaningful reduction in noise are. The honest answer usually involves conceding the overlap and being precise about the delta, and it works far better than pretending the incumbent does not do what it clearly does. If the only honest answer is that you are marginally better, you should disqualify and keep the credibility.

Say this: It probably covers most of the routine cases, and I would not replace it for that. The gap we usually find is specific — let us run a scoped two-week check against your current setup, and if it does not surface something your existing tool missed, there is no reason for you to buy this.

FAQ

Should a security startup sell to the CISO or to practitioners?

Both, in order. The practitioner evaluates and can veto, and their endorsement is what makes the internal case credible. The CISO holds budget and needs risk framed in reportable terms. Win the evaluator on technical merit, then equip them with the business case — cost avoided, tools retired, audit requirements met — for the conversation upwards.

How do security startups get their first customers without brand?

Through original research, a genuinely useful free tool, and practitioner communities where the founder participates as a peer. All three work because they demonstrate competence rather than asserting it, which is the only currency this audience accepts from an unknown vendor.

Does compliance-driven demand make a good beachhead?

Yes, and it is often the fastest one, because a certification or customer security requirement creates a deadline and releases budget. Map your product explicitly to the controls buyers report against so your champion can justify the purchase without translating it themselves.

How long should a security proof of value run?

Around two weeks, with a defined scope and an agreed success criterion set before it starts. Longer evaluations lose executive attention and drift; shorter ones rarely surface enough real data. Deliver a written report either way, because the report is itself a credibility asset regardless of the outcome.

Get your 90-day go-to-market plan

Mazo builds it from where you are today, then runs it with you every week. €99 a month, 14 days free.

Start 14-day free trial Not ready? Score your go-to-market free, no account needed →

How this guide was written. Written from the operating patterns Mazo applies to technical, high-scepticism markets — practitioner-led adoption in the tradition of Wes Bush's product-led growth work, trigger-event selling from Predictable Revenue and Winning by Design's SPICED, positioning from April Dunford. Figures given as lines are Mazo's working thresholds, not published benchmarks. Mazo is not affiliated with or endorsed by the authors named.